Rahul Dravid marches on

Rahul Dravid - Another recordRegular programming, i.e. post-match review of the third India-West Indies test, was interrupted briefly with the news that Rahul Dravid, now has thehighest test batting average for those who’ve made in excess of 7000 runs, conveniently of course casting aside the fact that a certain freak gent made 6996 runs at a fairly ridiculous batting average!

At the end of the St. Kitts test, Dravid averages 58.55. In addition, Dravid is 100 runs away from 9000 test runs and now only has the five gents of the 10,000 club ahead of him in the test runs list, having got to 8000 against Sri Lanka late last year.

Of course, it needs no mention that his cricketing twin will certainly catch up soon and eventually go past everyone else as far as total test runs and centuries are concerned. What about one-dayers? Perhaps not. He’ll need to make 20 more centuries and 6000 more runs before he gets past Tendulkar, and he’s probably going to stop playing one-dayers at some point of time or the other to focus on test cricket. I reckon Ponting will stop playing one-dayers when he’s 34-35.

Cross-posted on Cricket24×7.

11 Responses to Rahul Dravid marches on »»


Comments

  1. Comment by Ashton | 2006/06/30 at 00:07:48

    Is it only me or is there now a growing feeling that Dravid is overall a better batsman than Tendulkar?

  2. Comment by S Jagadish | 2006/06/30 at 14:02:38

    I’d reckon he’s certainly gone to a level of batting which Tendulkar only briefly reached, sometime in the late 1990s. Tendulkar is battling 16 years of cricket, injuries and the realization that he’s possibly not indispensable.

  3. Comment by Angshuman Hazra | 2006/06/30 at 17:02:54

    I am a great Dravid fan and consider most of his contributions invaluable but he too has an Achilles heel now. Since that period of glory between England tour of 2002 and the Pakistan tour of 2004 he has regularly failed to reach that elevated plane of batting in the defining moment of a series (with the series alive) to decie the odds in favour of his team. There are times he lacks that kind of support but even when he gets it he holds back when there is a pedal to be pressed for greater glory. Maybe captain Dravid is doing this to batsman Rahul.

    True he scores runs in tons in all innings of a match and against all comers, but this specific aspect of defining a series was what separated Rahul and VVS of the early 2000’s from the rest of their team - a team includng Sachin Tendulkar and Sourav Ganguly. Other mates drew from their feats and performed beyond themselves.

    As someone said, Rahul used to be the ever-ready platform for the other free-stroking batsmen to launch into the bowling. Now the time is ripe for him to embrace greater challenges by stepping up to the aggressor’s role. For all those who are about to shout ‘his role is different’, I have only one sentence: a person of his ability and willpower is as good as he wishes to. He needs more of the second now.

  4. Comment by Ankur Nagpal | 2006/06/30 at 19:38:00

    I don’t think Dravid has provided half the entertainment that Tendulkar has provided in his glory days - and whatever Dravid’s records might read, there will only be one Tendulkar amongst the people in India. The joy that Tendulkar has given the nation especially through the 1990’s - Sharjah et al is unparalleled… Sure, statistically he might be far inferior to Dravid (only in tests, mind you) but as a cricketer - both are all-time greats but amongst the Indians, there is only one Tendulkar (and Dravid will be the first one to say that)

    And as an overall cricketer, Tendulkar is a far more successful ODI cricketer - much higher strike rate, much more 100’s etc… and has more than 200 hundred international wickets. I’m sorry, but for me Tendulkar is and will remain unparalleled…. Though at THIS STAGE, at this point Dravid is anyday a greater and better batsman than Sachin.. but Sachin is Sachin! :)

  5. Comment by S Jagadish | 2006/06/30 at 22:11:55

    Ankur, I’m hardly concerned with entertainment. To me, an entertaining knock is a by-product. The central issue is whether the runs were what the team dearly required at that stage. Which is why I’d much rather watch McGrath in action than Shoaib Akhtar … Atherton bat than, say, Jayasuriya.

  6. Comment by Mohan | 2006/07/02 at 23:22:13

    Rahul is all time great in Indian Test cricket. It takes such a mental strength to score runs at test level at that average. Check his scores abroad, no other cricketer from India matches that record. Rahul is a class act.

    I played Coimbatore cricket league for Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore

  7. Comment by Angshuman Hazra | 2006/07/03 at 08:32:20

    The above 2 comments are classic examples of the dilemma that often splits a sports follower - a part of him sees things as a player and admires the player his OPPOSITION rates the highest for the results he produces, and the other is a pure viewer who wants to be entertained to the fullest by players in touch wirth the adventure associated with sport.

    Most of the cricketers I have grown to admire in my later years of following cricket belong to the 1st category, but the people who got me hooked to the game in the first place were invariably from the second. [Not that the 2 categories are mutually exclusive at all times…]

    Even today I find it tiresome to follow a match if neither of the teams has a few entertainers. The game needs both kinds of players to be at its healthiest.

  8. Comment by Ankur Nagpal | 2006/07/03 at 16:35:41

    Your comment makes a lot of sense Angshu.. I am by all accounts a die-hard cricket fan but these days I tend to find myself switching off the TV during the Indian innings when Sehwag gets out, until about the time Dhoni comes in! I guess I’m slowly becoming a bigger Sehwag fan than an Indian cricket fan! :)

  9. Comment by jackssmirkingrevenge | 2006/07/06 at 01:38:21

    i agree with angshuman, dravid is somewhat similar in his predicament to kallis in that he is criticised for not batting for the team and low strike-rates. even though i think he is a great player (bats like boycott but averages 10 more), but im not sure he’s on tendulkars level yet. tendulkars strike rate naturally means that he’ll average slightly less. tendulkars been there and done that, got the record for centuries, acclaim from bradman.. the lot. form is temporary, class permenant - dravid is in form at the moment, tendulkar is not. if asked to pick between them each at the peak of their powers.. it’d be tendulkar all day long

  10. Comment by S Jagadish | 2006/07/07 at 17:38:12

    jack: Please. Don’t compare Kallis and Dravid. Kallis is as selfish as they come. He’s screwed up umpteen number of times for South Africa - in the one-day series against India and the test series in Australia.

  11. Comment by Angshuman Hazra | 2006/07/11 at 19:33:59

    I agree with Jagadish here. It is unfair to say Dravid does not bat for the team. For all my respect for the others, I tend to respect Dravid more than any Indian batsman in the last 20 years - simply because every team (without anyone in it averaging 99.94) needs a Dravid who is like the silent guy in a bachelor’s party who makes the least noise, eats and drinks pretty ordinary and yet foots the largest share of the bill to make it a grand success. Look at the parties where Dravid came as a pauper and you will know.


Leave a Reply »»